Three Main Kinds Of Data Cables
There are three main kinds of data lines for mobile phones.
1. Micro USB data cable
Even though more and more phones are starting to use USB Type-C data cables, "Micro USB" is still the most common type of data cable for Android phones.
One of the most interesting things about this type of data cable is that one end is a "V-type port" and the other is a standard USB interface. The Micro-USB charger that goes with it is smaller and has a longer life and stronger plug-in. All of them are great, and they can be used with car chargers, digital cameras, MP3, MP4, and other devices. This makes them a kind of universal data cable.
2. USB Type-C data cable
USB Type-C is an updated version of Micro USB, but it is also very different. The size of the charging power is what has changed. It can be charged at up to 100W.
Most Android phones that support fast charging use a USB Type-C data cable and interface along with a high-power charger. This makes it possible for the phone to charge quickly. It's not built like Micro USB, so it can't be plugged in without looking.
3. Data cable for lighting
Most people who use mobile phones may not know what a "Lighting data cable" is, but almost everyone knows what an Apple mobile phone is, and the "Lighting data cable" is an Apple mobile phone. dedicated data cable.
It looks like a good idea, but the performance hasn't really changed much. This interface is used because I don't think Apple officially sells data cables. If they did, there wouldn't be data cables that cost nearly 1,000 yuan each. It is built like a USB Type-C, but the "male structure" and "female structure" are different. The female plug is for the USB Type-C data cable, while the male plug is for the Lighting data cable.
There isn't much of a difference between the three data lines. The plug or interface that a mobile phone or other device supports determines which data line can be used. These plugs and interfaces can be changed with special adapters, but this affects performance and does not change how users use the device. The article only talks about these three interfaces in simple terms. It doesn't compare them or talk about their parameters or how well they work.
